Let People Vote/ Reject R-88

Let People Vote/ Reject R-88: Alleged violations of RCW 42.17A.235 and .240 for failure to timely and accurately report expenditures or in-kind contributions for security (EY 19; Oct 19)

Case Details

Case Number

58745

Respondent

Let People Vote/ Reject R-88

Complainant

Washington Fairness Campaign (James Williams)

Date Opened

October 16, 2019

Case Status

Case Closed with Reminder

PDC staff dismissed for no violation, but reminded the respondent of the applicable law and to exercise caution in the future.

Learn More

Area(s) of Law*

  • RCW 29B.25.090/42.17A.235
  • RCW 29B.25.100/42.17A.240

*On January 1, 2026, RCW 42.17A was recodified to RCW 29B

Subscribe for Updates


{{statusMessage}}

To subscribe to this case, enter your email address in the form below and click "Send confirmation link" button. You will be sent a secure link via email that will confirm your subscription.


An email containing a link to confirm your subscription to this case has been sent to {{ email }}.

If you do not receive an email within a few minutes, please check your junk mail or mail filters.

Send again

{{statusMessage}}

Description

The complaint alleged Let People Vote, a ballot measure committee opposing Referendum 88, may have violated RCW 42.17A.235 and .240 by failing to timely and accurately report monetary expenditures or the receipt of in-kind contributions for security provided by the Proud Boys.

Volunteers (who are not paid by anyone in connection with the volunteer tasks they perform) may do certain campaign work without the Committee having to report the services as in-kind contributions. There is no indication the services provided by the Proud Boys are services the group typically provides for a fee.  

Based on these findings, staff has determined in this instance the alleged failure to timely and accurately report expenditures or in-kind contributions for security from the Proud Boys does not amount to a violation warranting further investigation.  

PDC staff is reminding Let People Vote about the importance of clarifying what services will be provided when making agreements with volunteers who provide services outside the common volunteer functions listed in WAC 390-17-405, in accordance with PDC laws and rules.  

Based on this information, the PDC finds that no further action is warranted and has dismissed this matter in accordance with RCW 42.17A.755(1). 

Penalties

None