Portland Vancouver Junction Railroad

Portland Vancouver Junction Railroad: Alleged violations of RCW 42.17A.255 for failure to report independent expenditures, and RCW 42.17A.320 for failure to disclose sponsor identificaiton (EY 20; August 20)

Case Details

Case Number

74490

Respondent

Portland Vancouver Junction Railroad

Complainant

Johnny Alvarado

Date Opened

August 02, 2020

Case Status

Case Closed with No Evidence of Violations

PDC staff found no evidence of violation.

Learn More

Area(s) of Law*

  • RCW 29B.25.120/42.17A.255
  • RCW 29B.30.050/42.17A.320

*On January 1, 2026, RCW 42.17A was recodified to RCW 29B

Subscribe for Updates


{{statusMessage}}

To subscribe to this case, enter your email address in the form below and click "Send confirmation link" button. You will be sent a secure link via email that will confirm your subscription.


An email containing a link to confirm your subscription to this case has been sent to {{ email }}.

If you do not receive an email within a few minutes, please check your junk mail or mail filters.

Send again

{{statusMessage}}

Description

The Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) has completed its review of the complaint filed on August 2, 2020. The complaint alleged that Portland Vancouver Junction Railroad (PVJR), a lobbyist employer during calendar year 2020, may have violated: (1) RCW 42.17A.255 for failure to report the value of independent expenditures for political advertising; and (2) RCW 42.17A.320 for failure to disclose sponsor identification on political advertising.

PDC staff reviewed the allegations; the applicable statutes, rules, and reporting requirements; the response provided by President Eric Temple, on behalf of PVJR (the “Respondent); and the applicable PDC reports filed by the Respondent, to determine whether the record supports a finding of one or more violations.

It appears that the posts referenced in the complaint did not meet the statutory definition of political advertisement and therefore did not require PVJR to include sponsor identification. In addition, staff did not find evidence that the posts were independent expenditures reportable under RCW 42.17A.255.

Based on our findings staff has determined that, in this instance, no evidence supports a finding of a violation that warrants further investigation.

Based on this information, the PDC finds that no further action is warranted and has dismissed this matter in accordance with RCW 42.17A.755(1).

Penalties

None