The PDC is aware of an issue that is causing data on its website to load slowly. We have alerted the state’s Open Data vendor and are urging it to find the root cause. In the meantime, trying hitting the refresh button, or wait a few moments before trying your data query again.
Ragan, Dale: Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.255 by failing to report independent expenditure for political advertising. (Apr 2019)
Ragan, Dale: Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.255 by failing to report independent expenditure for political advertising. (Apr 2019)
Case
#50825
Respondent
Dale Ragan
Complainant
Reece A. Williams
Description
This case alleged that the Respondent may have violated RCW 42.17A.255 by failing to report independent expenditure(s) for political advertising (e.g. No on Fire Bond signs). PDC staff reviewed the allegations, applicable statutes, rules and reporting requirements, the response provided by the Respondent, and the applicable PDC reports filed by the Respondent to determine whether they support a finding of one or more violations.
Based on staff's review, the PDC found that the Respondent purchased 50 signs from SignRocket on March 20, 2019 for $253.50. The signs contained an opposition ad concerning a fire bond and were distributed in Mt. Vernon in late March/early April of 2019. The signs were purchased and paid for by the Respondent using his own funds.
Pursuant to RCW 42.17A.255, a person who makes an independent expenditure equaling $100 or more (aggregate, per election campaign) in support or opposition to a candidate or ballot proposition is required to file a C-6 report with the PDC within 5 days. The Respondent indicated he was unaware of the need to report independent expenditures but quickly took corrective action upon being notified of his registration requirements.
PDC staff reminded the Respondent about the importance of timely disclosing any independent expenditures for political advertising and timely filing all future PDC reports, as applicable. The PDC found that no further action was warranted and dismissed the matter in accordance with RCW 42.17A.755(1).
To subscribe to this case, enter your email address in the form below and click "Send confirmation link" button.
You will be sent a secure link via email that will confirm your subscription.
An email containing a link to confirm your subscription to this case has been sent to {{
email }}.
If you do not receive an email within a few minutes, please check your junk mail or mail
filters.