- Home
- Rules & Enforcement
- Enforcement
- Enforcement Cases
- Mark Mullet: Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.320 for failure to provide complete sponsor identification on campaign advertisements. (EY24 JUL24)
#157283
Mark Mullet
Sam Hunt
PDC staff reviewed the allegations and evidence you submitted; the applicable statutes, rules, and reporting requirements; the response(s) provided by Mark Mullet (the “Respondent”); and other relevant information to determine whether the record supports a finding of one or more violations.
Applicable Laws & Rules
Per RCW 42.17A.320, all written political advertising, whether relating to candidates or ballot propositions, shall include the sponsor's name and address. For partisan office, if a candidate has expressed a party or independent preference on the declaration of candidacy, that party or independent designation shall be clearly identified in electioneering communications, independent expenditures, or political advertising. The font size must be in at least ten-point type, or in type at least ten percent of the largest size type used in a written advertisement or communication directed at more than one voter, such as a billboard or poster, whichever is larger.
Background & Findings
Based on staff’s review, we found the following:
Summary and Resolution
Based on our findings, staff has determined that, in this instance, failing to provide complete sponsor identification, to include party affiliation when a partisan office, on campaign advertising does not amount to a violation that warrants further investigation.
Pursuant to WAC 390-37-060(1)(d), however, Mark Mullet will receive a formal written warning concerning failing to provide complete sponsor identification, to include party affiliation when a partisan office, on campaign advertising. The formal written warning will include staff’s expectation that Mark Mullet, in the future, comply with RCW 42.17A.320 about what to provide and how to provide complete sponsor identification on political advertising. The Commission will consider the formal written warning in deciding on further Commission action if there are future violations of PDC laws or rules.
Based on this information, the PDC finds that no further action is warranted and has dismissed this matter in accordance with RCW 42.17A.755(1).
Case Closed with Written Warning
July 25, 2024
RCW 42.17A.320
To subscribe to this case, enter your email address in the form below and click "Send confirmation link" button. You will be sent a secure link via email that will confirm your subscription.
An email containing a link to confirm your subscription to this case has been sent to {{ email }}.
If you do not receive an email within a few minutes, please check your junk mail or mail filters.
{{statusMessage}}