Vinita Kak: Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.320 for failure to provide complete sponsor identification on campaign advertising (EY25 JUL25)

In a written response submitted to the PDC on Aug. 1, 2025, Kak stated “Apologies for the oversight. My campaign will begin removing the signs and then affixing a sticker (10% of the yard sign) to them so that we are compliant.”

Kak did not advance to the 2025 General Election. 

Based on our findings, staff has determined that, in this instance, any violation that may have occurred was minor and has been cured. After consideration of the circumstances, further proceedings would not serve the purpose of this chapter. Under WAC 390-37-060, the executive director, at any time prior to consideration by the commission, may dismiss a complaint which on its face, or as shown by investigation, provides reason to believe that a violation has occurred, but also shows that the respondent is in substantial compliance with the relevant statutes or rules, or shows that formal enforcement action is not warranted. 

Based on this information, the PDC has dismissed this matter in accordance with RCW 42.17A.755(1).

Pursuant to WAC 390-37-060(1)(d), however, you (Kak) are receiving a formal written warning concerning including proper sponsor identification on all political advertising. PDC staff expect you to include complete sponsor identification in the future. The Commission will consider this formal written warning in deciding on further Commission action if there are future violations of PDC laws or rules.