The PDC is aware of an issue that is causing data on its website to load slowly. We have alerted the state’s Open Data vendor and are urging it to find the root cause. In the meantime, trying hitting the refresh button, or wait a few moments before trying your data query again.
Washington State Republican Party: Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.335 for sponsoring political advertising containing a false statement of material fact about a candidate for public office (NOV24, EY24)
Washington State Republican Party: Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.335 for sponsoring political advertising containing a false statement of material fact about a candidate for public office (NOV24, EY24)
Case
#162582
Respondent
Washington State Republican Party
Complainant
Washington Democratic Party
Description
The Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) completed its review of the complaint filed by Washington State Democratic Central Committee on November 4, 2024. The complaint alleged violations of RCW 42.17A.335 for sponsoring political advertising containing a false statement of material fact about candidates for public office.
RCW 42.17A.335(1) states, in part, “It is a violation of this chapter for a person to sponsor with actual malice a statement constituting libel or defamation per se under the following circumstances: (a) Political advertising or an electioneering communication that contains a false statement of material fact about a candidate for public office...”
RCW 42.17A.005(1) states, "Actual malice" means to act with knowledge of falsity or with reckless disregard as to truth or falsity.
The statement at issue here does not meet the actual malice standard. The complaint asks the PDC to be the arbiter of whether a candidate’s lack of support for an initiative that supporters championed as an answer to concerns about gender-affirming care for minors is tantamount to support for allowing schools to provide that care without parents’ knowledge. That level of interpretation involves scrutiny of political debate, which invokes strong First Amendment protections. Such assessments are best left to the public and the political forum.
Based on these findings, PDC staff have determined the possible spuriousness of the text messages does not warrant further investigation by the PDC. The PDC has dismissed this matter in accordance with RCW 42.17A.755(1).
Disposition
Case Closed with No Evidence of Violations
Date Opened
November 20, 2024
Areas of Law*
RCW 29B.30.070/42.17A.335
*On January 1, 2026, RCW 42.17A was recodified to RCW 29B
To subscribe to this case, enter your email address in the form below and click "Send confirmation link" button.
You will be sent a secure link via email that will confirm your subscription.
An email containing a link to confirm your subscription to this case has been sent to {{
email }}.
If you do not receive an email within a few minutes, please check your junk mail or mail
filters.