Teresa Purcell

Purcell, Teresa (2) - Alleged Violation of RCW 42.17A.235 for failure to accurately report expenditures and contributions.

Case Details

Case Number

17876

Respondent

Teresa Purcell

Complainant

Glen Morgan

Date Opened

March 19, 2017

Case Status

Resolved by Attorney General - Violation

Attorney General's Office initiated court case. Court found violations occurred and entered judgment against the respondent.

Learn More

Area(s) of Law*

  • RCW 29B.25.090/42.17A.235
  • RCW 29B.25.100/42.17A.240
  • RCW 29B.40.130/42.17A.445

*On January 1, 2026, RCW 42.17A was recodified to RCW 29B

Subscribe for Updates


{{statusMessage}}

To subscribe to this case, enter your email address in the form below and click "Send confirmation link" button. You will be sent a secure link via email that will confirm your subscription.


An email containing a link to confirm your subscription to this case has been sent to {{ email }}.

If you do not receive an email within a few minutes, please check your junk mail or mail filters.

Send again

{{statusMessage}}

Description

The Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) has completed its review of the complaint filed by Glen Morgan on May 2, 2017. The complaint alleged that Teresa Purcell, a 2016 candidate for State Representative, for Legislative District 19 may have violated RCW 42.17A.235 for failure to timely and accurately file Monetary Contribution reports (C-3 reports) and Summary Full Campaign Contribution and Expenditure reports (C-4 reports), disclosing contributions and expenditures undertaken by the Campaign; RCW 42.17A.240 for failure to accurately and completely disclose debts and in-kind contributions; and RCW 42.17A.445 for personal use of campaign contributions.

PDC staff reviewed the allegations; the applicable statutes, rules, and reporting requirements; the responses provided by Teresa Purcell; the applicable PDC reports filed by the Respondent; and the Stipulation and Agreed Judgment entered between the Attorney General’s Office for the State of Washington and Teresa Purcell, to determine whether the record supports a finding of one or more violations.

The Superior Court had primary jurisdiction over the substance of the complaint, and the PDC will defer to its judgment in bringing this matter to resolution.

Penalties

None