The PDC is aware of an issue that is causing data on its website to load slowly. We have alerted the state’s Open Data vendor and are urging it to find the root cause. In the meantime, trying hitting the refresh button, or wait a few moments before trying your data query again.
Randi Knott: Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.320 for failure to provide sponsor identification on campaign advertising (EY25 OCT25)
Randi Knott: Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.320 for failure to provide sponsor identification on campaign advertising (EY25 OCT25)
Case
#180403
Respondent
Randi Knott
Complainant
Robert Anderson
Description
The Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) completed its review
of a complaint filed with the PDC.
Applicable Laws and Rules
RCW
42.17A.320(3) sets forth the size and placement requirements for
identifying the sponsor of political advertising. Subsection (a) states
that the font size used in the sponsor identification statement for a
written advertisement or communication directed at more than one voter
must be at least the larger of the following: 1) ten-point type; or 2) ten
percent of the largest type used in the advertisement.
Yard
signs were exempt from the requirement until June 2024.
In
2024, the PDC granted a one-time exemption to yard signs printed prior to
the effective date of the law. Starting in 2025, all yard signs,
regardless of when they were printed, must meet all requirements of RCW
42.17A.320
Background and Findings
The
Respondent registered with the PDC on May 5, 2025, under the Mini Reporting
option, for position of County Charter Review Commissioner for Clark County.
Upon
review of the evidence, the yard signs indicated in the complaint lacked
the address of the candidates campaign.
The
Respondent has not been warned, admitted to a violation, or found in
violation in the 2025 election cycle.
Summary and Resolution
Having reviewed the complaint and the supporting evidence,
PDC staff has determined that you appear to have violated RCW 42.17A. After
consideration of all the circumstances, further proceedings would not serve the
purposes of the Fair Campaign Practices Act. Under WAC 390-37-070, the
executive director, at any time prior to consideration by the Commission, may
dismiss a complaint which on its face, or as shown by investigation, provides
reason to believe that a violation has occurred, but also shows that the
respondent is in substantial compliance with the relevant statutes or rules, or
shows that formal enforcement action is not warranted.
Based on this, the PDC has dismissed this matter in
accordance with RCW 42.17A.755(1) and WAC 390-37-060(1)(d). PDC staff is
reminding you about the importance of timely reporting and sponsor
identification on political advertising. You are expected to comply with PDC
statutes and rules in the future.
To subscribe to this case, enter your email address in the form below and click "Send confirmation link" button.
You will be sent a secure link via email that will confirm your subscription.
An email containing a link to confirm your subscription to this case has been sent to {{
email }}.
If you do not receive an email within a few minutes, please check your junk mail or mail
filters.