The PDC is aware of an issue that is causing data on its website to load slowly. We have alerted the state’s Open Data vendor and are urging it to find the root cause. In the meantime, trying hitting the refresh button, or wait a few moments before trying your data query again.
Xerox Corporation Political Action Committee: Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.250 for failure to register as an out-of-state political committee (June 2017).
Xerox Corporation Political Action Committee: Alleged violation of RCW 42.17A.250 for failure to register as an out-of-state political committee (June 2017).
Case
#20780
Respondent
Xerox Corporation Political Action Committee
Complainant
Glen Morgan
Description
The complaint alleged that Xerox Corporate PAC may have violated RCW 42.17A.250 by failing to file an Out-of-State Committee Report (C-5 report) as required in accordance with RCW 42.17A.250, disclosing a $1,000 monetary contribution made to the 2016 Jay Inslee for Governor Campaign (Campaign).
On July 5, 2016, the Campaign timely filed a Monetary Contributions report (C-3 report) with the PDC disclosing the receipt of a $1,000 monetary contribution from Xerox Corporation PAC (Committee) on June 22, 2016.
While Xerox Corporation PAC was required to disclose the $1,000 contribution made to the Campaign in 2016 on a C-5 report, based on this information, the PDC has determined that the facts do warrant further investigation.
Pursuant to WAC 390-37-060(1)(d) PDC staff formally warned Xerox Corporation PAC concerning the importance of timely filing C-5 reports as required for a political committee registered with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) or in another state, in accordance with PDC laws and rules. The formal written warning includes staff’s expectation that Xerox Corporation PAC will timely C-5 reports in the future disclosing all contributions made to Washington State candidates and political committees registered with the PDC. The Commission will consider this formal written warning in deciding on further Commission action if there are future violations of PDC laws or rules.
Based on this information, the PDC has dismissed the complaint in accordance with RCW 42.17A.755(1).
To subscribe to this case, enter your email address in the form below and click "Send confirmation link" button.
You will be sent a secure link via email that will confirm your subscription.
An email containing a link to confirm your subscription to this case has been sent to {{
email }}.
If you do not receive an email within a few minutes, please check your junk mail or mail
filters.